Lectionary Ruminations 2.5 is a further revision and refinement
of my Lectionary Ruminations and Lectionary
Ruminations 2.0. Focusing on The Revised Common Lectionary Readings
for the upcoming Sunday from New Revised Standard Version (NRSV) of the Bible, Lectionary Ruminations 2.5 draws on over thirty years of pastoral
experience. Believing that the questions we ask are often more important
than any answers we find, without over reliance on commentaries, I intend with
sometimes pointed and sometimes snarky comments and Socratic like questions, to
encourage reflection and rumination for readers preparing to lead a Bible
study, draft liturgy, preach, or hear the Word. Reader comments are invited and
encouraged.
2:14a You might recall that
this verse was also part of last week’s Reading. Do you remember whom Peter is
addressing? Last week’s First Reading gave us the first part of Peter’s Sermon.
This week’s First Reading gives us the second part.
2:36 I hate it when a
reading begin with a “therefore” because we do not hear the previous reasoning.
Who is the entire house of Israel? Why does Peter refer to Jesus as “both” Lord
and Messiah? According to Peter, who crucified Jesus?
2:37 What does it mean and
feel like to be “cut to the heart”? When was the last time you were
“cut to the heart” and what precipitated it? Is there any
significance to the fact that the crowd addresses Peter and the other apostles
as “brothers”?
2:38 How do we reconcile the
Trinitarian baptismal formula with Peter’s admonition to be “baptized in the
name of Jesus Christ”? How does this verse address those who argue
that one must receive the Holy Spirit before being baptized?
2:39 What is the “promise”
Peter refers to? In this context, we might know who “you” and “your children”
are, but who are those “who are far away”? Does this verse offer a
justification for infant baptism?
2:40 I would love to hear
all those “many other arguments.” How do you understand “argument”?
2:41 Is there any
significance to the number three thousand?
PSALM 116:1-4, 12-19
116:1 Must one have a reason
to love the LORD? What does the Psalmist mean by voice? What is a
supplication?
116:2 Would the Psalmist
still have prayed if the Lord had not inclined an ear?
116:3 What are pangs? What is
Sheol?
116:4 This is perhaps the
shortest prayer in Scripture, sort of a fox hole prayer. How does one call on
the name of the LORD when the name of the LORD is not to be pronounced?
116:12 This is a good question
to ask when talking and thinking about stewardship. Nothing truly belongs to us,
yet we cannot realistically return it all.
116:13 What is the cup of
salvation? How might this verse influence our understanding of the Eucharist
and vice versa? Again, how does one call on the name of the LORD when the
LORD’s name is never pronounced? Should Christians observe the Jewish admonition
against pronouncing the LORD’s name?
116:14 What does it mean to
pay vows? What is a vow? Why pay them in the presence of the Lord’s people
rather than privately?
116:15 In what sense is death
ever precious? What about the death of those not faithful?
116:16 Note that the Psalm
transitions from narration to direct address. Who or what is a
serving girl? What bonds have been loosed?
116:17 What is a thanksgiving
sacrifice?
116:18 See verse 116:13. Might
this Psalm be a liturgical form?
116:19 What and where are the
courts of the house of the LORD?
1 PETER 1:17-23
1:17 This sounds a lot more
polished than what we heard from Peter in the First Reading. Is this
an argument for works righteousness? What is reverent fear? What
exile is Peter referring to?
1:18 Is there any other way
to read this verse other than through the lenses of a ransom theory of the
atonement? What ancestors is Peter referring to?
1:19 Is there any other way
to read this verse other than through the lenses of a theory of blood
atonement? Must a ransom theory and blood theory of the atonement go
hand in hand?
1:20 This sounds like Peter
is talking about a preexistent Christ. Might Presbyterians identify this as a
passage that argues for predestination? Why is “ages” plural?
1:21 Is this Theocentric
rather than Christocentric? Note that God raised Christ from the dead. Christ
did not raise himself.
1:22 How does obedience
purify? Does this suggest a works righteousness?
1:23 This being “born anew”
sounds like John’s being “born from above,” but what is this “not of perishable
but of imperishable seed?”
LUKE 24:13-35
24:13 What day is it? Is
there any significance to the fact that Emmaus was seven miles from
Jerusalem? What do you know about Emmaus? Who are “them” and why are
they not named?
24:14 What things had
happened?
24:15 I wonder from what
direction Jesus approached them.
24:16 How can one’s eyes be
kept from recognizing Jesus? Have you ever not recognized someone you knew
intimately?
24:17 Was this a rhetorical
question? Why did Jesus ask it? Why did the two look sad?
24:18 Do we know anything
else about Cleopas? Is this question the height of irony, or what?
24:19 Is this another
rhetorical question? To refer to Jesus as a “prophet” is pretty low
Christology and not much of a statement of faith.
24:20 Who crucified Jesus?
24:21 Notice the past tense. Do
they no longer hope this? Has all hope been lost?
24:22 Why are these “Some
Women” not named? What does it mean to be astounded? When
was the last time you were astounded and what astounded you?
24:23 Is there a difference
between “seeing angels” and “seeing a vision of angels”?
24:24 Who are “those who were
with us”? Who are “us”?
24:25 How often have you
wanted to preach something similar? What does it mean to be slow of heart?
24:26 Is this yet another
rhetorical question?
24:27 We have the law and the
prophets but no writings. Why no writings? I wonder how long this
interpretation took. What “scriptures” are being referred to?
24:28 It sounds as though the
two were either stopping or that Jesus started walking faster than they were
walking. Sometimes it seems like the church is still trying to catch
up with the resurrected Christ; that Jesus is out in front of the church.
24:29 What does the time of
day have to do with anything? This “stay with us” reminds me, in some sense, of
the Transfiguration account. Where were they staying? What were they staying
in?
24:30 Déjà vu: Where have we
heard this before?
24:30-31 I think these verses
offer one of the best arguments for frequent—even every Sunday—celebration of
the Eucharist. Why did Jesus vanish from their sight as soon as they
recognized him?
24:31 Read this in light of
verse 24:16.
24:32 Is there any relation
between the opening of the scriptures and the opening of the eyes? What does a
burning heart feel like? Has your heart ever burned and why?
24:33 Is “hour” perhaps more
than a simple reference to the chronological time of day? These two
are not numbered among the eleven. Who are their companions? Since it was
almost evening and the day was almost over back in 24:29, did they have to
travel to Jerusalem in the dark of night?
24:34 Who was saying this? Where and when did
the Lord appear to Simon? Is Simon the only one that matters? Did the Lord appear to no one else?
24:35 Does this offer new or additional meaning to Eucharistic remembering?
24:35 Does this offer new or additional meaning to Eucharistic remembering?
ADDENDUM
I am
a Minister Member of Upper Ohio Valley Presbytery of the Presbyterian Church
(U.S.A.) and am serving as the Interim Pastor of the Richmond United
Presbyterian Church, Richmond, Ohio. Sunday Worship at Richmond begins at 11:00
AM. Some of my other blog posts have appeared on PRESBYTERIAN BLOGGERS and The
Trek.
No comments:
Post a Comment