I listened to Natalie
Angier’s book The Canon: A Whirligig Tour of the Beautiful Basics of Science
on CD while driving to and from visiting family over the most recent Thanksgiving
holiday. Early in the work, Angier asked something like “What would you
identify as the five key concepts from your field? What is your field’s
cannon?”
The question first forced
me to think about what my field is. I hold a Master of Divinity degree,
generally recognized as the basic requirement for ordained ministry in main
line churches. I and many of my seminary alums would agree, however, that our
seminary education prepared us more to be theologians, and even biblical
scholars, than pastors engaged in parish ministry.
After over ten years of
parish ministry I earned a Doctor of Ministry, generally recognized as the
highest level of professional education relevant to pastoral ministry short of
the more academic Ph.D. While some Doctor of Ministry programs focus on
preaching, counseling, or spirituality, mine focused on Reformed Theology,
perhaps the most academic of the various Doctor of Ministry programs offered by
the seminary where I worked on and earned it. Working on that degree reinforced
my self-identification as a theologian.
In addition to having
served in both full time and part time pastoral ministry for over thirty years,
during those part time years I also served six years as part time staff for a
church regional governing body. I also taught as an Adjunct two semesters at a
small Roman Catholic Liberal Arts College where I taught courses in Theology
and ten semesters at a Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) related Liberal Arts
College where I taught courses in Religion and Philosophy. My adjunct teaching experiences reinforced my
self-understanding as a theologian.
This leaves me still
pondering the question - what is my field? Is my field theology or ministry? I
find it hard to separate one from the other. My theology informs my practice of
ministry and my practice of ministry informs my theology in a cyclical
dialectic. That is the perspective from which I answer Angier’s question about
what I identify as the five key concepts from my field, or my field’s cannon.
The first key concept I
think is essential to both theology and ministry and that I want worshipers in
the pew as well as spiritual but not religious people and those who shun
Christianity to know and understand is that the Bible is not one book dictated
by God or written by a single author in one place at one time. The Bible is
like a little library bound together. It is a collection of sixty-six writings
(or more if you are a Roman Catholic) written by dozens of authors from various
places and over nearly two thousand years whose original work was later edited
by others and assembled together in one collection, a process that took
centuries. These writings were assembled first by Jews and later adopted and added
to by Christians because many found these writings to be theologically
informative and spiritually meaningful.
Related to the above
concept is understanding that The Bible was not originally written in the
King James English, or any form of English. Most of the writings Christians
consider the Old Testament were originally written in ancient Hebrew and Aramaic and later translated into the ancient
common Koine Greek. The Hebrew and Aramaic writings that were later translated into Greek were later translated into Latin. The Greek and Latin were eventually
translated in English. That means that when we read the Bible in English that
we are sometimes reading a translation of a translation of a translation.
A third key concept is
the recognition that while there are certainly unique beliefs that separate
Christians from Jews and from other people of faith, beliefs such as the
affirmation that the mystery of God is best experienced, understood, and experienced
as a Trinity, and that Jesus is God in
the flesh, Christianity is one of many world religions. As a religion or system
of belief, Christianity shares many ideas and concepts with other world systems
of belief or religions. Christians share with Jews and Moslems the core belief
that there is only one God, and we believe in the same God, the God of Abraham and Sarah,
although we have different understandings of what the God of Abraham and Sarah calls us
to do and be. Some Christians have found affinity with Buddhism, although some
would consider Buddhism more of a philosophy than a religion.
A fourth key concept is
the interdisciplinary approach to ministry. Parish ministry is certainly
informed by the Bible, but it is also informed by the history and tradition of
theology and the church as well as the disciplines of philosophy, psychology,
and sociology. The Apostle Paul often drew upon Greek philosophy in his
writings. Augustine and other early Christian writers relied so heavily upon
Plato that they can be said to have baptized Plato. Thomas Aquinas was influenced
by Aristotle. Most parish pastors would probably agree that their counseling
practice is as informed as much by Psychology as the Bible and Theology.
Sociology has helped me understand the human dimensions of the Church and how congregations and even denominations have been influenced by the
economic, educational, political, and racial ethnic background of their
members.
Finally, even though Christians
believe that the church is the body of Christ, that body often seems to be torn
asunder by various expressions we call denominations. While some consider our
plethora of denominations an affront, I think it is a gift. If we think of the
church as the place we come to be spiritually fed and nurtured, then we might
consider the universal church as a spiritual restaurant. I prefer Wendy’s, but
when there is no Wendy’s around, I will satiate my appetite at McDonalds, Taco
Bell, Arby’s, Chick-fil-A, or any other number of franchises or independent
establishments. Even though I prefer Wendy’s, sometimes I tire of a single with
fries and want to eat something else. It is all food. It is all nourishing. But
I also trust that wherever I eat that the kitchen is observing sanitary
practices and has passed its health inspection. Just like there are some eating
establishments I would not eat in because of health inspection violations and
unsanitary conditions, some congregations can be unhealthy and even dangerous.
Stay away from them. Find one that
serves a varied menu of spiritually satisfying and religiously healthy entrees.